JAMES v. GILMORE
389 U.S. 572 (1968)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

JAMES v. GILMORE, 389 U.S. 572 (1968)

389 U.S. 572

JAMES, STATE TREASURER OF TEXAS, ET AL. v. GILMORE ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT
OF TEXAS. No. 850.
Decided January 15, 1968.

274 F. Supp. 75, affirmed.

Crawford C. Martin, Attorney General of Texas, George M. Cowden, First Assistant Attorney General, and J. C. Davis, W. O. Shultz II and James C. McCoy, Assistant Attorneys General, and A. J. Carubbi, Jr., for appellants.

David R. Richards for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.


SCHOOL COMM., CITY OF BOSTON v. BOARD OF EDUCATION, <a href="/cases/federal/us/389/572/case.html">389 U.S. 572</a> (1968) 389 U.S. 572 (1968) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

SCHOOL COMM., CITY OF BOSTON v. BOARD OF EDUCATION, 389 U.S. 572 (1968)

389 U.S. 572

SCHOOL COMMITTEE OF CITY OF BOSTON v. BOARD OF EDUCATION ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS.
No. 759.
Decided January 15, 1968.

352 Mass. 693, 227 N. E. 2d 729, appeal dismissed.

John W. White for appellant.

Elliot L. Richardson, Attorney General of Massachusetts, and Howard M. Miller, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 389 U.S. 572, 573




Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.