MERCER v. HEMMINGS
389 U.S. 46 (1967)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

MERCER v. HEMMINGS, 389 U.S. 46 (1967)

389 U.S. 46

MERCER ET AL. v. HEMMINGS ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA.
No. 406.
Decided October 23, 1967.

194 So.2d 579, 587, appeal dismissed.

Bruce Bromley, John H. Pickering, John R. Hupper, Hervey Yancey and Victor M. Earle III for appellants.

Chester Bedell for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE STEWART is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case assigned for oral argument.


BENNETT v. MISSISSIPPI, <a href="/cases/federal/us/389/46/case.html">389 U.S. 46</a> (1967) 389 U.S. 46 (1967) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

BENNETT v. MISSISSIPPI, 389 U.S. 46 (1967)

389 U.S. 46

BENNETT v. MISSISSIPPI.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI.
No. 460.
Decided October 23, 1967.

197 So.2d 886, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Hardy Lott and R. Cunliffe McBee for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 389 U.S. 46, 47

Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.