ILLINOIS v. CHICAGO, BURLINGTON & QUINCY R. CO.
389 U.S. 427 (1967)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

ILLINOIS v. CHICAGO, BURLINGTON & QUINCY R. CO., 389 U.S. 427 (1967)

389 U.S. 427

ILLINOIS EX REL. MAERAS, TREASURER & EX-OFFICIO COLLECTOR OF TAXES OF
MADISON COUNTY v. CHICAGO, BURLINGTON & QUINCY RAILROAD CO. ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS. No. 670.
Decided December 18, 1967.

36 Ill. 2d 585, 224 N. E. 2d 248, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Burton C. Bernard for appellant.

Hugh J. Dobbs, John F. Schlafly, Louis F. Gillespie, Gordon Burroughs, Eldon Martin, Jordan Jay Hillman and Robert L. Broderick for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.


HULSHART v. MARYLAND, <a href="/cases/federal/us/389/427/case.html">389 U.S. 427</a> (1967) 389 U.S. 427 (1967) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

HULSHART v. MARYLAND, 389 U.S. 427 (1967)

389 U.S. 427

HULSHART v. MARYLAND.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND.
No. 708, Misc.
Decided December 18, 1967.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

James D. Nolan for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 389 U.S. 427, 428

Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.