HAMRICK v. ALABAMA
389 U.S. 10 (1967)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

HAMRICK v. ALABAMA, 389 U.S. 10 (1967)

389 U.S. 10

HAMRICK v. ALABAMA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA.
No. 345.
Decided October 9, 1967.

281 Ala. 150, 199 So.2d 849, appeal dismissed.

William B. McCollough, Jr., for appellant.

MacDonald Gallion, Attorney General of Alabama, and Robert P. Bradley and Walter S. Turner, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


SMITH v. ARIZONA, <a href="/cases/federal/us/389/10/case.html">389 U.S. 10</a> (1967) 389 U.S. 10 (1967) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

SMITH v. ARIZONA, 389 U.S. 10 (1967)

389 U.S. 10

SMITH v. ARIZONA.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA.
No. 26, Misc.
Decided October 9, 1967.

Certiorari granted; 98 Ariz. 45, 401 P.2d 739, vacated and remanded.

Darrell F. Smith, Attorney General of Arizona, and Carl Waag, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Arizona in light of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE STEWART dissent.

Page 389 U.S. 10, 11

Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.