HADLEY v. MASSACHUSETTS
388 U.S. 464 (1967)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

HADLEY v. MASSACHUSETTS, 388 U.S. 464 (1967)

388 U.S. 464

HADLEY v. MASSACHUSETTS.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS.
No. 1179, Misc.
Decided June 12, 1967.

351 Mass. 439, 222 N. E. 2d 681, vacated and remanded.

Louis M. Nordlinger for appellant.

Elliot L. Richardson, Attorney General of Massachusetts, and Willie J. Davis, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts for further consideration in light of Camara v. Municipal Court of the City and County of San Francisco, 387 U.S. 523.

MR. JUSTICE CLARK, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, and MR. JUSTICE STEWART dissent and would affirm the judgment for the reasons stated in MR. JUSTICE CLARK'S dissenting opinion in Camara v. Municipal Court of the City and County of San Francisco, 387 U.S., at 546.

Page 388 U.S. 464, 465




Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.