HOLDING v. BLANKENSHIPAnnotate this Case
387 U.S. 94 (1967)
U.S. Supreme Court
HOLDING v. BLANKENSHIP, 387 U.S. 94 (1967)387 U.S. 94
HOLDING, DBA GRAND NEWS v. BLANKENSHIP ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF
OKLAHOMA. No. 1088.
Decided May 15, 1967.
259 F. Supp. 694, reversed in part and appeal dismissed and certiorari denied in part.
Samuel W. Block, Thomas P. Sullivan and Paul C. Duncan for appellant.
Probable jurisdiction noted as to Question 1. The judgment of the District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma entered November 4, 1966, is reversed insofar as it adjudged provisions of 1040.1 to 1040.10 of Title 21 of the Oklahoma Statutes to be constitutional. Bantam Books, Inc. v. Sullivan, 372 U.S. 58. Treating the nonappealable issue presented by Question 2 as if contained in a petition for a writ of certiorari, the petition is denied. See Mishkin v. New York, 383 U.S. 502, 512.
MR. JUSTICE HARLAN concurs in the denial of certiorari as to Question 2, but would affirm the judgment of the District Court as to Question 1.
MR. JUSTICE WHITE would note probable jurisdiction and set the case for oral argument.
Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.