SCHACKMAN v. ARNEBERGH
387 U.S. 427 (1967)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

SCHACKMAN v. ARNEBERGH, 387 U.S. 427 (1967)

387 U.S. 427

SCHACKMAN ET AL. v. ARNEBERGH, CITY ATTORNEY FOR THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES,
ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF

CALIFORNIA.

No. 1186.
Decided May 29, 1967.

258 F. Supp. 983, 996, appeal dismissed.

Burton Marks for appellants.

Roger Arnebergh, pro se, Bourke Jones and Robert B. Burns for appellees Arnebergh et al.; Harold W. Kennedy, George Wakefield and Martin E. Weekes for appellees Younger et al.; and Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, pro se, and A. Barry Cappello, Deputy Attorney General, for appellee Lynch.

PER CURIAM.

Appellants seek review by this Court of the refusal by the District Court to convene a three-judge District Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2281-2284. We have held that such review is available in the Court of Appeals, Idlewild Bon Voyage Liquor Corp. v. Epstein, 370 U.S. 713, and not in this Court. Buchanan v. Rhodes, 385 U.S. 3.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

Page 387 U.S. 427, 428




Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.