MILLER BREWING CO. v. JONES, DIR., REV. OF ILLINOIS., 386 U.S. 684 (1967)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court Reports
MILLER BREWING CO. v. JONES, DIR., REV. OF ILLINOIS., 386 U.S. 684 (1967) 386 U.S. 684MILLER BREWING CO. v. JONES, DIRECTOR
OF REVENUE OF ILLINOIS.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS.
No. 1067.
Decided April 17, 1967.
35 Ill. 2d 86, 219 N.E.2d 494, appeal dismissed.
Frank H. Uriell and Paul A. Teschner for appellant.
William G. Clark, Attorney General of Illinois, and Richard A. Michael and John J. O'Toole, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Opinions
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS.
No. 1067.
Decided April 17, 1967.
35 Ill. 2d 86, 219 N.E.2d 494, appeal dismissed. Frank H. Uriell and Paul A. Teschner for appellant. William G. Clark, Attorney General of Illinois, and Richard A. Michael and John J. O'Toole, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Page 386 U.S. 684, 685
U.S. Supreme Court Reports
MILLER BREWING CO. v. JONES, DIR., REV. OF ILLINOIS., 386 U.S. 684 (1967) 386 U.S. 684 (1967) 386 U.S. 684 386 U.S. 684"> MILLER BREWING CO. v. JONES, DIRECTOR OF REVENUE OF ILLINOIS.APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS.
No. 1067.
Decided April 17, 1967.
35 Ill. 2d 86, 219 N.E.2d 494, appeal dismissed. Frank H. Uriell and Paul A. Teschner for appellant. William G. Clark, Attorney General of Illinois, and Richard A. Michael and John J. O'Toole, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Page 386 U.S. 684, 685
Search This Case
