LITTLE v. RHAY
385 U.S. 96 (1966)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

LITTLE v. RHAY, 385 U.S. 96 (1966)

385 U.S. 96

LITTLE v. RHAY, PENITENTIARY SUPERINTENDENT.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON.
No. 669, Misc.
Decided November 14, 1966.

68 Wash. 2d 353, 413 P.2d 15, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Francis Conklin for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers submitted as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 385 U.S. 96, 97


BOARD SATANTA JOINT R. H. SCH. v. HASKELL CTY. PLAN., <a href="/cases/federal/us/385/96/case.html">385 U.S. 96</a> (1966) 385 U.S. 96 (1966) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

BOARD SATANTA JOINT R. H. SCH. v. HASKELL CTY. PLAN., 385 U.S. 96 (1966)

385 U.S. 96

BOARD OF SATANTA JOINT RURAL HIGH SCHOOL, DISTRICT NO. 2, ET AL. v.
HASKELL COUNTY PLANNING BOARD ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF KANSAS. No. 560.
Decided November 14, 1966.

197 Kan. 321, 416 P.2d 791, appeal dismissed.

Dale M. Stucky for appellants.

Robert C. Londerholm, Attorney General of Kansas, and J. Richard Foth, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.




Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.