DOWDLE v. NEW YORK - 385 U.S. 7 (1966)


U.S. Supreme Court

DOWDLE v. NEW YORK, 385 U.S. 7 (1966)

385 U.S. 7

DOWDLE ET AL. v. NEW YORK ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 204.
Decided October 10, 1966.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

John Manning Regan for appellants.

William J. Stevens for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.


CALCATERRA v. ILLINOIS, <a href="/cases/federal/us/385/7/case.html">385 U.S. 7</a> (1966) 385 U.S. 7 (1966) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

CALCATERRA v. ILLINOIS, 385 U.S. 7 (1966)

385 U.S. 7

CALCATERRA v. ILLINOIS.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS.
No. 267.
Decided October 10, 1966.

33 Ill. 2d 541, 213 N. E. 2d 270, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Charles A. Bellows for appellant.

William G. Clark, Attorney General of Illinois, and Richard A. Michael, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 385 U.S. 7, 8



Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.