COLORADO-UTE ELECTRIC ASSOC. v. WESTERN COLORADO POWER
385 U.S. 22 (1966)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

COLORADO-UTE ELECTRIC ASSOC. v. WESTERN COLORADO POWER, 385 U.S. 22 (1966)

385 U.S. 22

COLORADO-UTE ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION, INC. v. WESTERN COLORADO POWER CO.
ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO. No. 437.
Decided October 24, 1966.

159 Colo. 262, 411 P.2d 785, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

John A. Hughes, Raphael J. Moses and John J. Conway for appellant.

Francis M. Shea, William H. Dempsey, Jr., and John R. Barry for appellees Western Colorado Power Co. et al.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.


BRADFORD v. GAVAGAN, <a href="/cases/federal/us/385/22/case.html">385 U.S. 22</a> (1966) 385 U.S. 22 (1966) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

BRADFORD v. GAVAGAN, 385 U.S. 22 (1966)

385 U.S. 22

BRADFORD v. GAVAGAN, JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE
OF NEW YORK, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK. No. 574, Misc.
Decided October 24, 1966.

Appeal dismissed.

Appellant pro se.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First Assistant Attorney General, and Brenda Soloff, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 385 U.S. 22, 23




Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.