FORD v. CALIFORNIA
384 U.S. 100 (1966)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

FORD v. CALIFORNIA, 384 U.S. 100 (1966)

384 U.S. 100

FORD, AKA PHELAN v. CALIFORNIA.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE
DISTRICT. No. 1089.
Decided April 25, 1966.

236 Cal. App. 2d 438, 46 Cal. Rptr. 144, appeal dismissed.

Richard G. Harris for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


KRAMER v. UNITED STATES, <a href="/cases/federal/us/384/100/case.html">384 U.S. 100</a> (1966) 384 U.S. 100 (1966) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

KRAMER v. UNITED STATES, 384 U.S. 100 (1966)

384 U.S. 100

KRAMER ET AL. v. UNITED STATES.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 1114.
Decided April 25, 1966.

Certiorari granted; 355 F.2d 891, partially vacated and remanded.

Anna R. Lavin and Frank J. McGarr for petitioners.

Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the representations of the Solicitor General and upon an independent examination of the entire record, the petition for a writ of certiorari is granted, the order suspending the imposition of sentence for the conviction on count two of the indictment as to Roy E. Kramer is vacated, and the cause is remanded to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois for entry of an appropriate sentence. In all other respects the petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.

Page 384 U.S. 100, 101




Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.