BECK v. McLEOD
382 U.S. 454 (1966)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

BECK v. McLEOD, 382 U.S. 454 (1966)

382 U.S. 454

BECK v. McLEOD, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF
SOUTH CAROLINA. No. 770.
Decided January 31, 1966.

240 F. Supp. 708, affirmed.

Samuel C. Craven for appellant.

Daniel R. McLeod, Attorney General of South Carolina, and Everett N. Brandon, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed.

Page 382 U.S. 454, 455


UNITED STATES v. WILSON & CO., INC., <a href="/cases/federal/us/382/454/case.html">382 U.S. 454</a> (1966) 382 U.S. 454 (1966) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

UNITED STATES v. WILSON & CO., INC., 382 U.S. 454 (1966)

382 U.S. 454

UNITED STATES ET AL. v. WILSON & CO., INC., ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT.
No. 56.
Decided January 31, 1966.

335 F.2d 788, remanded.

Solicitor General Marshall for the United States et al.

Howard J. Trienens for respondents American Telephone & Telegraph Co. et al.

PER CURIAM.

The joint motion of counsel to remand is granted and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in order to permit the entry of a decree of restitution in accordance with the agreement of the parties.

Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.