NEHRING v. GERRITY
382 U.S. 202 (1965)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

NEHRING v. GERRITY, 382 U.S. 202 (1965)

382 U.S. 202

NEHRING v. GERRITY.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS.
No. 614.
Decided December 6, 1965.

31 Ill. 2d 608, 203 N. E. 2d 402, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 382 U.S. 202, 203


CALIFORNIA DEMOCRATIC COUNCIL v. ARNEBERGH, <a href="/cases/federal/us/382/202/case.html">382 U.S. 202</a> (1965) 382 U.S. 202 (1965) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

CALIFORNIA DEMOCRATIC COUNCIL v. ARNEBERGH, 382 U.S. 202 (1965)

382 U.S. 202

CALIFORNIA DEMOCRATIC COUNCIL ET AL. v. ARNEBERGH ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE
DISTRICT. No. 583.
Decided December 6, 1965.

233 Cal. App. 2d 425, 43 Cal. Rptr. 531, appeal dismissed.

Leon M. Cooper for appellants.

Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, Charles A. Barrett, Assistant Attorney General, Sanford N. Gruskin, Deputy Attorney General, Harold W. Kennedy, Roger Arnebergh, pro se, and Bourke Jones for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.




Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.