HERALD PUBLISHING CO. v. WHITEHEAD-DONOVAN CORP.
382 U.S. 13 (1965)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

HERALD PUBLISHING CO. v. WHITEHEAD-DONOVAN CORP., 382 U.S. 13 (1965)

382 U.S. 13

HERALD PUBLISHING CO. v. WHITEHEAD-DONOVAN CORP.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.
No. 156.
Decided October 11, 1965.

62 Cal. 2d 185, 397 P.2d 426, appeal dismissed.

James G. Butler for appellant.

George G. Shapitric for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.


BOWMAN v. LAKE COUNTY PUBLIC BUILDING COMMISSION, <a href="/cases/federal/us/382/13/case.html">382 U.S. 13</a> (1965) 382 U.S. 13 (1965) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

BOWMAN v. LAKE COUNTY PUBLIC BUILDING COMMISSION, 382 U.S. 13 (1965)

382 U.S. 13

BOWMAN v. LAKE COUNTY PUBLIC BUILDING COMMISSION ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS.
No. 170.
Decided October 11, 1965.

31 Ill. 2d 575, 203 N. E. 2d 129, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Paul E. Hamer for appellant.

Andrew A. Semmelman and Bruno W. Stanczak for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 382 U.S. 13, 14

Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.