JOBE v. CITY OF ERLANGER
382 U.S. 12 (1965)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

JOBE v. CITY OF ERLANGER, 382 U.S. 12 (1965)

382 U.S. 12

JOBE ET AL. v. CITY OF ERLANGER.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF KENTUCKY.
No. 62.
Decided October 11, 1965.

383 S. W. 2d 675, appeal dismissed.

James C. Ware for appellants.

Harry L. Riggs, Jr., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.


ALUMINUM CO. OF AMERICA v. UNITED STATES, <a href="/cases/federal/us/382/12/case.html">382 U.S. 12</a> (1965) 382 U.S. 12 (1965) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

ALUMINUM CO. OF AMERICA v. UNITED STATES, 382 U.S. 12 (1965)

382 U.S. 12

ALUMINUM CO. OF AMERICA ET AL. v. UNITED STATES.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF
MISSOURI. No. 84.
Decided October 11, 1965.

233 F. Supp. 718; 247 F. Supp. 308, affirmed.

Herbert A. Bergson, Howard Adler, Jr., Daniel H. Margolis and William K. Unverzagt for appellants.

Solicitor General Cox, Acting Assistant Attorney General Wright, Lionel Kestenbaum, Jerry Z. Pruzansky and Edna Lingreen for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Page 382 U.S. 12, 13

Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.