BURNHAM VAN SERVICE v. PENTECOST
382 U.S. 106 (1965)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

BURNHAM VAN SERVICE v. PENTECOST, 382 U.S. 106 (1965)

382 U.S. 106

BURNHAM VAN SERVICE ET AL. v. PENTECOST ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE.
No. 494.
Decided November 15, 1965.

Appeal dismissed.

J. G. Lackey, Jr., for appellants.

George F. McCanless, Attorney General of Tennessee, and Milton P. Rice, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 382 U.S. 106, 107


ALABAMA HIGHWAY EXPRESS, INC. v. UNITED STATES, <a href="/cases/federal/us/382/106/case.html">382 U.S. 106</a> (1965) 382 U.S. 106 (1965) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

ALABAMA HIGHWAY EXPRESS, INC. v. UNITED STATES, 382 U.S. 106 (1965)

382 U.S. 106

ALABAMA HIGHWAY EXPRESS, INC., ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
ALABAMA. No. 447.
Decided November 15, 1965.

241 F. Supp. 290, affirmed.

James W. Wrape and Robert E. Joyner for appellants.

Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Robert B. Hummel, Robert W. Ginnane and Robert S. Burk for the United States et al.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.




Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.