FOX v. UNITED STATES
381 U.S. 436 (1965)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

FOX v. UNITED STATES, 381 U.S. 436 (1965)

381 U.S. 436

FOX v. UNITED STATES.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF
LOUISIANA. No. 1032.
Decided June 1, 1965.

Affirmed.

Sidney W. Provensal, Jr., for appellant.

Solicitor General Cox for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Page 381 U.S. 436, 437


MOTOR CONVOY, INC., v. UNITED STATES, <a href="/cases/federal/us/381/436/case.html">381 U.S. 436</a> (1965) 381 U.S. 436 (1965) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

MOTOR CONVOY, INC., v. UNITED STATES, 381 U.S. 436 (1965)

381 U.S. 436

MOTOR CONVOY, INC., ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT
OF GEORGIA. No. 987.
Decided June 1, 1965.

235 F. Supp. 250, affirmed.

Paul M. Daniell, Robert E. Born and Martin Sack for appellants.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick, Robert B. Hummel, Robert W. Ginnane and Betty Jo Christian for the United States et al.; George S. Dixon for National Automobile Transporters Association; and Nelson M. Harris, Jr., for Dixie Transport Co., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.




Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.