BILLY v. OKLAHOMA
381 U.S. 354 (1965)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

BILLY v. OKLAHOMA, 381 U.S. 354 (1965)

381 U.S. 354

BILLY v. OKLAHOMA.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF OKLAHOMA.
No. 1034.
Decided May 24, 1965.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 397 P.2d 913.

Sid White for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 381 U.S. 354, 355


SAMARA v. OKLAHOMA CAPITOL IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY, <a href="/cases/federal/us/381/354/case.html">381 U.S. 354</a> (1965) 381 U.S. 354 (1965) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

SAMARA v. OKLAHOMA CAPITOL IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY, 381 U.S. 354 (1965)

381 U.S. 354

SAMARA ET AL. v. OKLAHOMA CAPITOL IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OKLAHOMA.
No. 1002.
Decided May 24, 1965.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 398 P.2d 89.

Leroy Powers and Gus Rinehart for appellants.

Charles Nesbitt, Attorney General of Oklahoma, and Harvey H. Cody and Joseph C. Muskrat, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.




Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.