TRANS-LUX DIST. CORP. v. BOARD OF REGENTS UNIV. N. Y.
380 U.S. 259 (1965)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

TRANS-LUX DIST. CORP. v. BOARD OF REGENTS UNIV. N. Y., 380 U.S. 259 (1965)

380 U.S. 259

TRANS-LUX DISTRIBUTING CORP. v. BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE
UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK. No. 314.
Decided March 15, 1965.

14 N. Y. 2d 88, 198 N. E. 2d 242, reversed.

Harry I. Rand for appellant.

Charles A. Brind for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is reversed. Freedman v. Maryland, ante, p. 51.


SANTOS v. TEXAS, <a href="/cases/federal/us/380/259/case.html">380 U.S. 259</a> (1965) 380 U.S. 259 (1965) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

SANTOS v. TEXAS, 380 U.S. 259 (1965)

380 U.S. 259

SANTOS v. TEXAS.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CRIMINAL
APPEALS OF TEXAS. No. 340, Misc.
Decided March 15, 1965.

Certiorari granted, judgment vacated and case remanded.

Reported below: 379 S. W. 2d 667.

Orville A. Harlan for petitioner.

Waggoner Carr, Attorney General of Texas, and Howard M. Fender, Gilbert J. Pena and Allo B. Crow, Jr., Assistant Attorneys General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas for further consideration in light of the opinion of this Court in Aguilar v. Texas, 378 U.S. 108.

Page 380 U.S. 259, 260

Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.