LIND v. MINNESOTA - 379 U.S. 9 (1964)


U.S. Supreme Court

LIND v. MINNESOTA, 379 U.S. 9 (1964)

379 U.S. 9

LIND v. MINNESOTA ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA.
No. 163, Misc.
Decided October 12, 1964.

Appeal dismissed.

Appellant pro se.

Walter F. Mondale, Attorney General of Minnesota, and Charles E. Houston and Linus J. Hammond, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed.

Page 379 U.S. 9, 10


JURUS v. COLUMBUS BAR ASSOCIATION, <a href="/cases/federal/us/379/9/case.html">379 U.S. 9</a> (1964) 379 U.S. 9 (1964) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

JURUS v. COLUMBUS BAR ASSOCIATION, 379 U.S. 9 (1964)

379 U.S. 9

JURUS v. COLUMBUS BAR ASSOCIATION.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO.
No. 260.
Decided October 12, 1964.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 175 Ohio St. 449, 196 N. E. 2d 94.

George E. Tyack for appellant.

S. Noel Melvin for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.






Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.