FPC v. Amerada Petroleum Corp.
379 U.S. 687 (1965)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

FPC v. Amerada Petroleum Corp., 379 U.S. 687 (1965)

Federal Power Commission v. Amerada Petroleum Corp.

No. 585

Decided February 1, 1965

379 U.S. 687

Syllabus

1. Where a supplier sells natural gas to an interstate pipeline company which commingles it with gas from other sources and uses some of the mixture intrastate, but sells a substantial portion thereof in interstate Commerce, the parties may not avoid the jurisdiction of the Federal Power Commission by stipulating in their contract that, contrary to the actuality of pipeline transportation, all the supplier's gas sold under the contract will be used intrastate. California v. Lo-Vaca Gathering Co., ante, p. 379 U. S. 366, followed. P. 379 U. S. 690.

2. The doctrine of collateral estoppel is not applicable here, since only the scope of future regulation concerning transactions not governed by past decisions is involved. P. 379 U. S. 690.

Certiorari granted; 334 F.2d 404 reversed.

Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.