VOORHES v. DEMPSEY
379 U.S. 648 (1965)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

VOORHES v. DEMPSEY, 379 U.S. 648 (1965)

379 U.S. 648

VOORHES ET AL. v. DEMPSEY, GOVERNOR OF CONNECTICUT, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF
CONNECTICUT. No. 600.
Decided January 18, 1965.

231 F. Supp. 975, affirmed.

Colin C. Tait for appellants.

Harold M. Mulvey, Attorney General of Connecticut, and Raymond J. Cannon, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.


LYLES v. BETO, <a href="/cases/federal/us/379/648/case.html">379 U.S. 648</a> (1965) 379 U.S. 648 (1965) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

LYLES v. BETO, 379 U.S. 648 (1965)

379 U.S. 648

LYLES v. BETO, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 263, Misc.
Decided January 18, 1965.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Reported below: 329 F.2d 332.

E. D. Vickery for petitioner.

Waggoner Carr, Attorney General of Texas, and Sam R. Wilson, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of Massiah v. United States, 377 U.S. 201.

Page 379 U.S. 648, 649

Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.