ALVAREZ v. CALIFORNIA
379 U.S. 4 (1964)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

ALVAREZ v. CALIFORNIA, 379 U.S. 4 (1964)

379 U.S. 4

ALVAREZ v. CALIFORNIA.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE
DISTRICT. No. 46, Misc.
Decided October 12, 1964.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 379 U.S. 4, 5


ACCELERATED TRANSPORT-PONY EXPRESS, v. UNITED STATES, <a href="/cases/federal/us/379/4/case.html">379 U.S. 4</a> (1964) 379 U.S. 4 (1964) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

ACCELERATED TRANSPORT-PONY EXPRESS, v. UNITED STATES, 379 U.S. 4 (1964)

379 U.S. 4

ACCELERATED TRANSPORT-PONY EXPRESS, INC., ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF VERMONT.
No. 131.
Decided October 12, 1964.

227 F. Supp. 815, affirmed.

Bryce Rea, Jr., and Louis Lisman for appellants.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick, Robert B. Hummel, Robert W. Ginnane and Betty Jo Christian for the United States et al.; W. G. Burnette for Lynchburg Traffic Bureau; Arthur A. Arsham and John J. C. Martin for National Small Shipments Traffic Conference, Inc., et al.; and John M. Cleary, John F. Donelan and Dickson R. Loos for National Industrial Traffic League, appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.