DENMAN v. WHITE
379 U.S. 28 (1964)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

DENMAN v. WHITE, 379 U.S. 28 (1964)

379 U.S. 28

DENMAN ET UX. v. WHITE, SECRETARY OF STATE OF MASSACHUSETTS, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF
MASSACHUSETTS. No. 379, Misc.
Decided November 9, 1964.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed.

Page 379 U.S. 28, 29


TRAUTWEIN v. COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, LOS ANGELES, <a href="/cases/federal/us/379/28/case.html">379 U.S. 28</a> (1964) 379 U.S. 28 (1964) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

TRAUTWEIN v. COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, LOS ANGELES, 379 U.S. 28 (1964)

379 U.S. 28

TRAUTWEIN ET AL. v. COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF LOS ANGELES.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.
No. 416.
Decided November 9, 1964.*

[Footnote *] Together with No. 426, Goldman et ux. v. Community Redevelopment Agency of Los Angeles, also on appeal from the same court.

Appeals dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 61 Cal. 2d 21, 389 P.2d 538.

Frank Wickhem for appellants in No. 416.

Appellants pro se in No. 426.

Henry O. Duque for appellee in both cases.

Austin Clapp for John Swigart et al., as amici curiae, in support of appellants in No. 426.

PER CURIAM.

The motion of John Swigart et al., for leave to file a brief as amici curiae in No. 426 is granted. The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeals are dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeals were taken as petitions for writs of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.