CITY OF PLANTATION v. UTILITIES OPERATING CO., INC.
379 U.S. 2 (1964)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

CITY OF PLANTATION v. UTILITIES OPERATING CO., INC., 379 U.S. 2 (1964)

379 U.S. 2

CITY OF PLANTATION v. UTILITIES OPERATING CO., INC.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA.
No. 72.
Decided October 12, 1964.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 156 So.2d 842.

Carl A. Hiaasen for appellant.

William E. Miller and Robert J. Corber for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 379 U.S. 2, 3


DAVIS v. NEELY, <a href="/cases/federal/us/379/2/case.html">379 U.S. 2</a> (1964) 379 U.S. 2 (1964) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

DAVIS v. NEELY, 379 U.S. 2 (1964)

379 U.S. 2

DAVIS v. NEELY ET UX.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OKLAHOMA.
No. 68.
Decided October 12, 1964.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 387 P.2d 494.

John W. Willis for appellant.

Thomas D. Finney, Jr., and Grant W. Wiprud for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.




Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.