DIXIE FEED & SEED CO., v. BYRD
379 U.S. 15 (1964)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

DIXIE FEED & SEED CO., v. BYRD, 379 U.S. 15 (1964)

379 U.S. 15

DIXIE FEED & SEED CO., INC., ET AL. v. BYRD.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE.
No. 311.
Decided October 19, 1964.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: ___ Tenn. App. ___, 376 S. W. 2d 745.

W. Neil Thomas, Jr., for appellants.

H. Keith Harber for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


BOINEAU v. THORNTON, <a href="/cases/federal/us/379/15/case.html">379 U.S. 15</a> (1964) 379 U.S. 15 (1964) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

BOINEAU v. THORNTON, 379 U.S. 15 (1964)

379 U.S. 15

BOINEAU ET AL. v. THORNTON, SECRETARY OF STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF
SOUTH CAROLINA. No. 483.
Decided October 19, 1964.

235 F. Supp. 175, affirmed.

Ralph E. Becker for appellants.

Daniel R. McLeod, Attorney General of South Carolina, and Clarence T. Goolsby, Jr., and Everett N. Brandon, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Page 379 U.S. 15, 16

Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.