CEPERO v. PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, 379 U.S. 12 (1964)

Syllabus

U.S. Supreme Court

CEPERO v. PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, 379 U.S. 12 (1964) 379 U.S. 12

CEPERO v. PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
NEW YORK. No. 176, Misc.
Decided October 12, 1964.

Appeal dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed.

THE CHIEF JUSTICE took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.


379 U.S. 12 (1964) 379 U.S. 12 (1964) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

BINZ v. HELVETIA FLORIDA ENTERPRISES, INC., 379 U.S. 12 (1964) 379 U.S. 12


Opinions

U.S. Supreme Court

CEPERO v. PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, 379 U.S. 12 (1964) 379 U.S. 12 CEPERO v. PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
NEW YORK. No. 176, Misc.
Decided October 12, 1964.

Appeal dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed.

THE CHIEF JUSTICE took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.


379 U.S. 12 (1964) 379 U.S. 12 (1964) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

BINZ v. HELVETIA FLORIDA ENTERPRISES, INC., 379 U.S. 12 (1964) 379 U.S. 12 BINZ v. HELVETIA FLORIDA ENTERPRISES, INC.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA.
No. 181, Misc.
Decided October 12, 1964.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Guion T. De Loach for appellant.

Lewis Horwitz for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 379 U.S. 12, 13