RUARK v. COLORADOAnnotate this Case
378 U.S. 585 (1964)
U.S. Supreme Court
RUARK v. COLORADO, 378 U.S. 585 (1964)378 U.S. 585
RUARK v. COLORADO.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO.
No. 1173, Misc.
Decided June 22, 1964.
Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.
Petitioner pro se.
Duke W. Dunbar, Attorney General of Colorado, Frank E. Hickey, Deputy Attorney General, and John E. Bush, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Colorado for consideration in light of Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353.
MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, dissenting.
For the reasons stated in my dissenting opinion in Smith v. Crouse, ante, p. 584, I would set this case for argument.
Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.