TOWN OF FRANKLIN v. BUTTERWORTH
378 U.S. 562 (1964)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

TOWN OF FRANKLIN v. BUTTERWORTH, 378 U.S. 562 (1964)

378 U.S. 562

TOWN OF FRANKLIN ET AL. v. BUTTERWORTH ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF
CONNECTICUT. No. 1032.
Decided June 22, 1964.

229 F. Supp. 754, affirmed.

John D. Fassett for appellants.

Richard H. Bowerman for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.


SENK v. PENNSYLVANIA, <a href="/cases/federal/us/378/562/case.html">378 U.S. 562</a> (1964) 378 U.S. 562 (1964) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

SENK v. PENNSYLVANIA, 378 U.S. 562 (1964)

378 U.S. 562

SENK v. PENNSYLVANIA.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA.
No. 900, Misc.
Decided June 22, 1964.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Reported below: 412 Pa. 184, 194 A. 2d 221.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania is vacated and the case is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with the opinion of this Court in Jackson v. Denno, ante, p. 368.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK, MR. JUSTICE CLARK, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE STEWART dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in Jackson v. Denno, supra.

Page 378 U.S. 562, 563




Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.