Marder v. Massachusetts
377 U.S. 407 (1964)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

Marder v. Massachusetts, 377 U.S. 407 (1964)

Marder v. Massachusetts

No. 819

Decided June 1, 1964

377 U.S. 407

APPEAL FROM THE SUPERIOR COURT OF

MASSACHUSETTS, SUFFOLK COUNTY

Appeal dismissed for want of substantial federal question.

Reported below: see 346 Mass. 408, 193 N.E.2d 695.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE GOLDBERG, with whom MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS joins, dissenting.

This appeal raises the question of whether a person charged with a traffic violation (or presumably any other criminal offense) may be forced by a statute, General Laws of Mass. c. 90, §§ 20 and 20A, to choose between foregoing a trial by pleading guilty and paying a small fine, or going to trial and thereby exposing himself to the possibility of a greater punishment if found guilty. I express no view on the merits of this question. But I would note probable jurisdiction, since the issue, in my view, presents a substantial federal question, and since I am not convinced that the generally sound advice to "pay the two dollars" necessarily reflects a constitutionally permissible requirement.

MR. JUSTICE WHITE is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.