MARKS v. ESPERDY, 377 U.S. 214 (1964)
Argued:
April 2, 1964
Decided:
May 18, 1964
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
MARKS v. ESPERDY, 377 U.S. 214 (1964) 377 U.S. 214MARKS v. ESPERDY, DISTRICT DIRECTOR,
IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION
SERVICE.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND
CIRCUIT. No. 253.
Argued April 2, 1964.
Decided May 18, 1964.
315 F.2d 673, affirmed by an equally divided Court.
Murray A. Gordon argued the cause and filed briefs for petitioner.
Charles Gordon argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller and L. Paul Winings.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.
Opinions
SERVICE.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 253.
Argued April 2, 1964.
Decided May 18, 1964.
315 F.2d 673, affirmed by an equally divided Court. Murray A. Gordon argued the cause and filed briefs for petitioner. Charles Gordon argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller and L. Paul Winings. PER CURIAM. The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court. MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN took no part in the decision of this case. Page 377 U.S. 214, 215
U.S. Supreme Court
MARKS v. ESPERDY, 377 U.S. 214 (1964) 377 U.S. 214 MARKS v. ESPERDY, DISTRICT DIRECTOR, IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATIONSERVICE.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 253.
Argued April 2, 1964.
Decided May 18, 1964.
315 F.2d 673, affirmed by an equally divided Court. Murray A. Gordon argued the cause and filed briefs for petitioner. Charles Gordon argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller and L. Paul Winings. PER CURIAM. The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court. MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN took no part in the decision of this case. Page 377 U.S. 214, 215
Materials
Search This Case