BONTZ v. KANSAS, 377 U.S. 162 (1964)

Syllabus

U.S. Supreme Court

BONTZ v. KANSAS, 377 U.S. 162 (1964) 377 U.S. 162

BONTZ v. KANSAS.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF KANSAS.
No. 758.
Decided May 4, 1964.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 192 Kan. 158, 163, 386 P.2d 201, 205.

Verne M. Laing for appellant.

William M. Ferguson, Attorney General of Kansas, and Keith Sanborn for appellee.

PER CURIAM.


Opinions

U.S. Supreme Court

BONTZ v. KANSAS, 377 U.S. 162 (1964) 377 U.S. 162 BONTZ v. KANSAS.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF KANSAS.
No. 758.
Decided May 4, 1964.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 192 Kan. 158, 163, 386 P.2d 201, 205.

Verne M. Laing for appellant.

William M. Ferguson, Attorney General of Kansas, and Keith Sanborn for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK, MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Page 377 U.S. 162, 163