VOKES v. CITY OF CHICAGO
377 U.S. 124 (1964)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

VOKES v. CITY OF CHICAGO, 377 U.S. 124 (1964)

377 U.S. 124

VOKES ET AL. v. CITY OF CHICAGO.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS.
No. 855.
Decided April 20, 1964.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 28 Ill. 2d 475, 193 N. E. 2d 40.

Charles A. Bellows for appellants.

John C. Melaniphy, Sydney R. Drebin and Robert J. Collins for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 377 U.S. 124, 125


378 REALTY CORP. v. NEW YORK RENT & REHAB. ADMIN., <a href="/cases/federal/us/377/124/case.html">377 U.S. 124</a> (1964) 377 U.S. 124 (1964) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

378 REALTY CORP. v. NEW YORK RENT & REHAB. ADMIN., 377 U.S. 124 (1964)

377 U.S. 124

378 REALTY CORP. ET AL. v. NEW YORK CITY RENT AND REHABILITATION
ADMINISTRATION ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK. No. 845.
Decided April 20, 1964.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 13 N. Y. 2d 902, 193 N. E. 2d 510.

Harris L. Present and Irving S. Freedman for appellants.

Beatrice Shainswit for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.