SHUTTLESWORTH v. BIRMINGHAM, 376 U.S. 339 (1964)

Argued: February 27, 1964
Decided: March 9, 1964
Syllabus

U.S. Supreme Court

SHUTTLESWORTH v. BIRMINGHAM, 376 U.S. 339 (1964) 376 U.S. 339

SHUTTLESWORTH v. CITY OF BIRMINGHAM.
CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF ALABAMA.
No. 168.
Argued February 27, 1964.
Decided March 9, 1964.

42 Ala. App. 1, 149 So. 2d 921, reversed.

Jack Greenberg argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were James M. Nabrit III, Peter A. Hall and Orzell Billingsley, Jr.

J. M. Breckenridge argued the cause and filed a brief for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals of Alabama is reversed. Cole v. Arkansas, 333 U.S. 196; Williams v. Georgia, 349 U.S. 375.


Opinions

U.S. Supreme Court

SHUTTLESWORTH v. BIRMINGHAM, 376 U.S. 339 (1964) 376 U.S. 339 SHUTTLESWORTH v. CITY OF BIRMINGHAM.
CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF ALABAMA.
No. 168.
Argued February 27, 1964.
Decided March 9, 1964.

42 Ala. App. 1, 149 So. 2d 921, reversed.

Jack Greenberg argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were James M. Nabrit III, Peter A. Hall and Orzell Billingsley, Jr.

J. M. Breckenridge argued the cause and filed a brief for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals of Alabama is reversed. Cole v. Arkansas, 333 U.S. 196; Williams v. Georgia, 349 U.S. 375.

MR. JUSTICE WHITE took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 376 U.S. 339, 340