METROMEDIA, INC. v. CITY OF PASADENA
376 U.S. 186 (1964)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

METROMEDIA, INC. v. CITY OF PASADENA, 376 U.S. 186 (1964)

376 U.S. 186

METROMEDIA, INC., ET AL. v. CITY OF PASADENA ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE
DISTRICT. No. 659.
Decided February 17, 1964.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 216 Cal. App. 2d 270, 30 Cal. Rptr. 731.

Charles Seligson, William French Smith and Paul E. Iverson for appellants.

Charles S. Rhyne for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


ARLAN'S DEPARTMENT STORE OF LOUISVILLE v. KENTUCKY, <a href="/cases/federal/us/376/186/case.html">376 U.S. 186</a> (1964) 376 U.S. 186 (1964) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

ARLAN'S DEPARTMENT STORE OF LOUISVILLE v. KENTUCKY, 376 U.S. 186 (1964)

376 U.S. 186

ARLAN'S DEPARTMENT STORE OF LOUISVILLE, INC., v. KENTUCKY.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF KENTUCKY.
No. 665.
Decided February 17, 1964.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 369 S. W. 2d 9.

James E. Thornberry for appellant.

Robert Matthews, Attorney General of Kentucky, and Robert L. Montague III and Holland N. McTyeire, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 376 U.S. 186, 187

Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.