SAYLES FINISHING PLANTS, INC., v. TOOMEY
375 U.S. 9 (1963)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

SAYLES FINISHING PLANTS, INC., v. TOOMEY, 375 U.S. 9 (1963)

375 U.S. 9

SAYLES FINISHING PLANTS, INC., v. TOOMEY, TAX ASSESSOR.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPERIOR COURT OF RHODE ISLAND.
No. 188.
Decided October 14, 1963.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: See ___ R. I. ___, 188 A. 2d 91.

Frederick Bernays Wiener and Gerald W. Harrington for appellant.

Charles S. Rhyne and Alfred J. Tighe, Jr. for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


BREWER v. NORTH CAROLINA, <a href="/cases/federal/us/375/9/case.html">375 U.S. 9</a> (1963) 375 U.S. 9 (1963) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

BREWER v. NORTH CAROLINA, 375 U.S. 9 (1963)

375 U.S. 9

BREWER ET AL. v. NORTH CAROLINA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA.
No. 291.
Decided October 14, 1963.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 258 N.C. 533, 129 S. E. 2d 262.

Malcolm B. Seawell and William T. Hatch for appellants.

Thomas Wade Bruton, Attorney General of North Carolina, and Harry W. McGalliard, Deputy Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 375 U.S. 9, 10

Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.