BRAZOSPORT SAVINGS & LOAN ASSOCIATION v. PHILLIPS
375 U.S. 438 (1964)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

BRAZOSPORT SAVINGS & LOAN ASSOCIATION v. PHILLIPS, 375 U.S. 438 (1964)

375 U.S. 438

BRAZOSPORT SAVINGS & LOAN ASSOCIATION ET AL. v. PHILLIPS ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS.
No. 565.
Decided January 13, 1964.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 366 S. W. 2d 929.

John J. McKay for appellants.

Waggoner Carr, Attorney General of Texas, Joe R. Long and Howard W. Mays, Assistant Attorneys General, Edward Clark and Martin Harris for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


STICKLER v. OHIO, <a href="/cases/federal/us/375/438/case.html">375 U.S. 438</a> (1964) 375 U.S. 438 (1964) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

STICKLER v. OHIO, 375 U.S. 438 (1964)

375 U.S. 438

STICKLER v. OHIO.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO.
No. 601.
Decided January 13, 1964.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 174 Ohio St. 382, 189 N. E. 2d 433.

Jack G. Day for appellant.

Fred Cartolano for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 375 U.S. 438, 439




Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.