DAVIS v. CITY OF BOWLING GREEN
375 U.S. 43 (1963)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

DAVIS v. CITY OF BOWLING GREEN, 375 U.S. 43 (1963)

375 U.S. 43

DAVIS ET AL. v. CITY OF BOWLING GREEN, KENTUCKY, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF
KENTUCKY. No. 331.
Decided October 21, 1963.

Judgment affirmed.

Albert O. Scafuro for appellants.

Squire R. Ogden for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Page 375 U.S. 43, 44


HUMBLE OIL & REFINING CO. v. MALE, <a href="/cases/federal/us/375/43/case.html">375 U.S. 43</a> (1963) 375 U.S. 43 (1963) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

HUMBLE OIL & REFINING CO. v. MALE, 375 U.S. 43 (1963)

375 U.S. 43

HUMBLE OIL & REFINING CO. ET AL. v. MALE, COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT
OF LABOR & INDUSTRY, NEW JERSEY.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY. No. 326.
Decided October 21, 1963.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

T. Girard Wharton and John W. Fritz for appellants.

Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General of New Jersey, and Theodore I. Botter, First Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.