CEPERO v. PELOSO - 375 U.S. 16 (1963)


U.S. Supreme Court

CEPERO v. PELOSO, 375 U.S. 16 (1963)

375 U.S. 16

CEPERO v. PELOSO.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
NEW YORK. No. 116, Misc.
Decided October 14, 1963.

Appeal dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Appellant pro se.

Solicitor General Cox for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Page 375 U.S. 16, 17


REATZ v. NEW YORK, <a href="/cases/federal/us/375/16/case.html">375 U.S. 16</a> (1963) 375 U.S. 16 (1963) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

REATZ v. NEW YORK, 375 U.S. 16 (1963)

375 U.S. 16

REATZ v. NEW YORK.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE APPELLATE DIVISION, SUPREME COURT
OF NEW YORK, SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT. No. 50, Misc.
Decided October 14, 1963.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Petitioner pro se.

William I. Siegel for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Judicial Department, for further consideration in light of Griffin v. Illinois, 351 U.S. 12, Eskridge v. Washington Prison Board, 357 U.S. 214, and Norvell v. Illinois, 373 U.S. 420.



Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.