FRIEDMAN v. COURT ON THE JUDICIARY
375 U.S. 10 (1963)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

FRIEDMAN v. COURT ON THE JUDICIARY, 375 U.S. 10 (1963)

375 U.S. 10

FRIEDMAN, JUSTICE, v. COURT ON THE JUDICIARY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT ON THE JUDICIARY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK.
No. 285.
Decided October 14, 1963.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Theodore Kiendl and Raphael H. Weissman for appellant.

John R. Davison and William R. Brennan for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.


LOUISIANA v. JEANSONNE, <a href="/cases/federal/us/375/10/case.html">375 U.S. 10</a> (1963) 375 U.S. 10 (1963) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

LOUISIANA v. JEANSONNE, 375 U.S. 10 (1963)

375 U.S. 10

LOUISIANA EX REL. SCHWEGMANN BANK & TRUST CO. ET AL. v. JEANSONNE,
STATE BANK COMMISSIONER.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL OF LOUISIANA, FIRST CIRCUIT. No. 311.
Decided October 14, 1963.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 144 So.2d 159.

Charles A. O'Niell, Jr. for appellants.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 375 U.S. 10, 11




Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.