BRIGGS v. LOUISIANA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION
374 U.S. 96 (1963)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

BRIGGS v. LOUISIANA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION, 374 U.S. 96 (1963)

374 U.S. 96

BRIGGS v. LOUISIANA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION, COMMITTEE ON BAR ADMISSIONS.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA.
No. 1070, Misc.
Decided June 10, 1963.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Appellant pro se.

Felicien Y. Lozes for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


BOLLETTIERI v. NEW YORK, <a href="/cases/federal/us/374/96/case.html">374 U.S. 96</a> (1963) 374 U.S. 96 (1963) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

BOLLETTIERI v. NEW YORK, 374 U.S. 96 (1963)

374 U.S. 96

BOLLETTIERI v. NEW YORK.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, ONEIDA COUNTY.
No. 1378, Misc.
Decided June 10, 1963.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Appellant pro se.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, and Robert E. Fischer and Maxwell B. Spoont, Special Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Page 374 U.S. 96, 97




Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.