SIDENER v. CALIFORNIA
374 U.S. 494 (1963)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

SIDENER v. CALIFORNIA, 374 U.S. 494 (1963)

374 U.S. 494

SIDENER v. CALIFORNIA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.
No. 1372, Misc.
Decided June 17, 1963.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 58 Cal. 2d 645, 375 P.2d 641.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 374 U.S. 494, 495


AUFLICK v. WAINWRIGHT, <a href="/cases/federal/us/374/494/case.html">374 U.S. 494</a> (1963) 374 U.S. 494 (1963) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

AUFLICK v. WAINWRIGHT, 374 U.S. 494 (1963)

374 U.S. 494

AUFLICK v. WAINWRIGHT, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR.
ON MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS.
No. 979, Misc.
Decided June 17, 1963.

Motion for leave to file petition for writ of habeas corpus denied; certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Petitioner pro se.

Richard W. Ervin, Attorney General of Florida, and A. G. Spicola, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The motion for leave to file petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied. Treating the papers submitted as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335.

Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.