PAIGE v. NORTH CAROLINA
374 U.S. 491 (1963)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

PAIGE v. NORTH CAROLINA, 374 U.S. 491 (1963)

374 U.S. 491

PAIGE v. NORTH CAROLINA.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA.
No. 884, Misc.
Decided June 17, 1963.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Petitioner pro se.

Thomas Wade Bruton, Attorney General of North Carolina, and Ralph Moody, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335.


ACUFF v. TEXAS, <a href="/cases/federal/us/374/491/case.html">374 U.S. 491</a> (1963) 374 U.S. 491 (1963) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

ACUFF v. TEXAS, 374 U.S. 491 (1963)

374 U.S. 491

ACUFF v. TEXAS.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS.
No. 1348, Misc.
Decided June 17, 1963.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 172 Tex. Cr. R. 176, 354 S. W. 2d 939.

Appellant pro se.

Waggoner Carr, Attorney General of Texas, and Sam R. Wilson, Linward Shivers, Allo B. Crow, Jr. and Gilbert J. Pena, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 374 U.S. 491, 492




Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.