BRADLEY v. IOWA
374 U.S. 490 (1963)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

BRADLEY v. IOWA, 374 U.S. 490 (1963)

374 U.S. 490

BRADLEY v. IOWA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA.
No. 934, Misc.
Decided June 17, 1963.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 254 Iowa 211, 116 N. W. 2d 439.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 374 U.S. 490, 491


MAYS v. CALIFORNIA, <a href="/cases/federal/us/374/490/case.html">374 U.S. 490</a> (1963) 374 U.S. 490 (1963) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

MAYS v. CALIFORNIA, 374 U.S. 490 (1963)

374 U.S. 490

MAYS v. CALIFORNIA.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.
No. 871, Misc.
Decided June 17, 1963.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Reported below: See 205 Cal. App. 2d 798, 23 Cal. Rptr. 605.

Petitioner pro se.

Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, and William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353.

MR. JUSTICE CLARK and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in Douglas v. California, 372 U.S., at 358, 360.

Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.