PRICE v. MOSS
374 U.S. 103 (1963)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

PRICE v. MOSS, 374 U.S. 103 (1963)

374 U.S. 103

PRICE ET AL. v. MOSS ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF
OKLAHOMA. No. 688.
Decided June 10, 1963.*

[Footnote *] Together with No. 689, Oklahoma Farm Bureau et al. v. Moss et al., on appeal from the same Court.

Appeals dismissed because the order of the District Court is not appealable under 28 U.S.C. 1253.

Reported below: 207 F. Supp. 885.

Walt Allen, Jim A. Rinehart, Leon S. Hirsh and James C. Harkin for appellants in No. 688.

Frank Carter for appellants in No. 689.

Norman E. Reynolds, Jr. and Sid White for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeals are dismissed as the order of the District Court is not appealable under 28 U.S.C. 1253.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE GOLDBERG concur in the result.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN would postpone consideration of the question of jurisdiction until after argument on the merits.

Page 374 U.S. 103, 104

Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.