COUNTS v. COUNTS
373 U.S. 543 (1963)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

COUNTS v. COUNTS, 373 U.S. 543 (1963)

373 U.S. 543

COUNTS v. COUNTS.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF TEXAS, THIRD SUPREME JUDICIAL
DISTRICT. No. 1058, Misc.
Decided May 27, 1963.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 358 S. W. 2d 192.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 373 U.S. 543, 544


BUFFINGTON v. WAINWRIGHT, <a href="/cases/federal/us/373/543/case.html">373 U.S. 543</a> (1963) 373 U.S. 543 (1963) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

BUFFINGTON v. WAINWRIGHT, 373 U.S. 543 (1963)

373 U.S. 543

BUFFINGTON v. WAINWRIGHT, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA.
No. 706, Misc.
Decided May 27, 1963.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Petitioner pro se.

Richard W. Ervin, Attorney General of Florida, and A. G. Spicola, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335.

Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.