FLORA CONSTRUCTION CO. v. GRAND JUNCTION STEEL FAB.
373 U.S. 240 (1963)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

FLORA CONSTRUCTION CO. v. GRAND JUNCTION STEEL FAB., 373 U.S. 240 (1963)

373 U.S. 240

FLORA CONSTRUCTION CO. v. GRAND JUNCTION STEEL FABRICATING CO. ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA.
No. 949.
Decided May 13, 1963.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dispense with printing the jurisdictional statement is granted.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 373 U.S. 240, 241


SHOTT v. OHIO, <a href="/cases/federal/us/373/240/case.html">373 U.S. 240</a> (1963) 373 U.S. 240 (1963) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

SHOTT v. OHIO, 373 U.S. 240 (1963)

373 U.S. 240

SHOTT v. OHIO.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO.
No. 877.
Decided May 13, 1963.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 173 Ohio St. 542, 184 N. E. 2d 213.

Thurman Arnold, James G. Andrews, Jr. and John A. Lloyd, Jr. for appellant.

Harry C. Schoettmer for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.