PUNTARI v. PENNSYLVANIA
372 U.S. 708 (1963)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

PUNTARI v. PENNSYLVANIA, 372 U.S. 708 (1963)

372 U.S. 708

PUNTARI v. PENNSYLVANIA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA.
No. 718, Misc.
Decided April 15, 1963.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 372 U.S. 708, 709


LUCKMAN v. DUNBAR, <a href="/cases/federal/us/372/708/case.html">372 U.S. 708</a> (1963) 372 U.S. 708 (1963) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

LUCKMAN v. DUNBAR, 372 U.S. 708 (1963)

372 U.S. 708

LUCKMAN v. DUNBAR, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR, ET AL.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.
No. 63, Misc.
Decided April 15, 1963.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Petitioner pro se.

Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, and Robert R. Granucci and John S. McInerny, Deputy Attorneys General, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353.

MR. JUSTICE CLARK and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN dissent for the reasons stated in their opinions in Douglas v. California, 372 U.S., at 358, 360.




Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.