SALT RIVER PROJECT AGRI. IMPROV. & POWER DIST. v. MESA
372 U.S. 704 (1963)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

SALT RIVER PROJECT AGRI. IMPROV. & POWER DIST. v. MESA, 372 U.S. 704 (1963)

372 U.S. 704

SALT RIVER PROJECT AGRICULTURAL IMPROVEMENT & POWER DIST. v. CITY OF MESA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA.
No. 803.
Decided April 15, 1963.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 92 Ariz. 91, 373 P.2d 722.

William R. Meagher for appellant.

J. La Mar Shelley, Charles S. Rhyne, Brice W. Rhyne and Alfred J. Tighe, Jr. for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


DANIELS v. UNITED STATES, <a href="/cases/federal/us/372/704/case.html">372 U.S. 704</a> (1963) 372 U.S. 704 (1963) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

DANIELS v. UNITED STATES, 372 U.S. 704 (1963)

372 U.S. 704

DANIELS v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA.
No. 814.
Decided April 15, 1963.

210 F. Supp. 942, affirmed.

John W. Bonner for appellant.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger, Robert B. Hummel, Robert W. Ginnane and Arthur J. Cerra for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission; Newell Gough, Jr. and Edwin S. Booth for Great Northern Railway Co., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Page 372 U.S. 704, 705

Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.